Do you think Atty Berg is going to get any traction out of this letter to congress re: Obama?

Berg is ‘outraged’ at Congress as they failed the citizens of the United States by ‘not’ challenging Obama during the Electoral Vote on January 8, 2009 and Demands that Congressional Hearings be held regarding the ‘qualifications’ of Obama as we are headed for a ‘Constitutional Crisis’ by having an ‘ineligible’ President

LAFAYETTE HILL, PA — Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, in the U.S. Supreme Court is still pending regarding an Application for an Injunction, announced today that he wrote a letter to ‘each’ Member of Congress requesting they call for Congressional Hearings regarding Obama’s lack of qualifications for President due to their failure to question Obama during the Joint Session of Congress for the counting of the Electoral Votes. [A copy of the letter to Congress is at the end of this Release]

Berg said, “I am disappointed for the 300+ million U.S. citizens, our ‘Forefathers’ and for the tens of thousands that have died defending ‘our’ Constitution regarding the recent denial by the U.S. Supreme Court.

I am committed to keeping our efforts going to continue litigation until the truth of Obama being ‘not qualified’ for President comes out. The Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘HOAX’ ever put forth to the citizens of the United States in 230 years.

In addition to the current case in the U.S. Supreme Court, we have or will have:

A case filed two [2] months ago captioned Berg vs. Obama, said case ‘under seal’ so I cannot comment further;

The case of Hollister vs. Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama, filed 12/31/08 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 08-02254; said case being an ‘Interpleader’ case with the Plaintiff, a retired Colonel from the U.S. Air Force, who is questioning whether to obey or disobey an order if Obama recalls him, based upon whether or not Obama is a ‘qualified’ President;

The case that was denied in the U.S. Supreme Court is still pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Berg vs. Obama, with our Brief due by January 20, 2009; and

If Obama is sworn in as President, we will file a Petition for Writ of ‘Quo Warranto,’ a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as President because he is ‘not qualified.’

Berg states ‘if Soetoro a/k/a Obama is sworn in’ because Obama knows he is ‘not qualified’ and he should hold a Press Conference and Obama should state that I, as a black American, received more votes than anyone else on November 4, 2008 for President and on January 8, 2009 the Joint Session of Congress counted the Electoral College votes and announced that I am President-elect, but because of things in my background, I cannot be sworn in as President. However, Obama is not man enough to state the above!

More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the constitutional ‘qualifications’ for President. When the truth finally comes out, individuals including Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle Obama, Howard Dean [Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)], other top officials of the DNC, senior campaign staff and some of his new administration should be brought into the criminal justice system, indicted and tried with incarceration for those convicted.

Berg continued, “Obama is setting himself up to be blackmailed and perhaps he is already being blackmailed. He was the candidate for ‘change,’ but look at his cabinet ­ 70% from President Clinton’s days and how about his Secretary of Defense, Gates. Give me a break!

There is nothing more important than ‘our’ U.S. Constitution and we will fight on!”

Accordingly, I wrote the Members of Congress requesting immediate hearings. The letter I sent follows:

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

January 15, 2009

Dear Member of Congress:

It is your duty, as a duly elected representative of the American people; to regain the respect you have lost by your inaction in not vetting Soetoro a/k/a Obama, by calling for a Congressional Hearing ASAP to determine the truth regarding qualifications of Barry Soetoro, otherwise known as Barack Hussein Obama, to be President of the United States.

My, my, you and the other Members of Congress just showed your true character, that being, no guts, no backbone and only interested in getting re-elected.

I refer to each of you in your lack of action regarding the now President-elect Soetoro/Obama.

As you must be aware, there are many unresolved questions concerning Soetoro/Obama’s status or lack thereof, as a ‘natural born’ American citizen, as required by ‘our’ U.S. Constitution.

On January 8, 2009, you failed your constituencies, your voters, the citizens in your district, as well as all citizens in our nation. Yes, you failed all of u

Please take a look, I really need some advice.?

I recently filed a “Writ of Mandamus” with my lawyer because USCIS has not moved my I-130 petition since I filed in 2006. My lawyer thinks this was our best route to getting them to get off their asses and do their jobs. Has anyone done this before and how did it turn out? It was mighty expensive so I am hoping it works. Any stories good or bad would be nice to hear just to get some knowledge about which was our case could go. Thanks!

Attorney’s withdrawal from Case?

Here is a very simple request. What is it called, that you need to file in court when an attorney files a motion to withdrawal from your case? Is it a motion, a petition, or a writ, and if you know what is the proper name of the whole title and how do you file?
I should have also said, how do you file such, to ask the judge to go in your favor, and not allow your attorney to withdrawal. Especially when it is being scheduled for a trial by jury very soon.
He has filed to withdrawal on 11/10/08.

What will be the Obama citizenship conspiracy theory du jour after December 1st?

Apologies in advance; the setup for this is a bit longwinded. Here we go:

The current meme associated with Obama’s citizenship is that December 1st is the date it all hits the fan. This is apparently solely based on Philip Berg’s press release of November 7th, titled “U.S. Supreme Court Awaits Response to Berg’s Writ of Certiorari from Obama, DNC and Co-Defendants”

The press release says, “…the U. S. Supreme Court has set dates in which Barack Obama, the DNC and all co-Defendants are to respond to the Writ, which is on or before December 1, 2008.”

To begin with, there’s one major problem here: Berg can’t file a writ. That’s what the Supreme Court would do. What Berg has filed is a *petition* for SCOTUS to issue a writ – he is asking the court to ask the Philadelphia court to send them Berg’s suit against Obama to them for review. Four judges will have to agree to this petition before the writ is issued.

So what the Supreme Court has done is scheduled Berg’s petition on their docket, and said to all parties, “hey, tell us by December 1st why you think we should or shouldn’t respond to this petition” See:

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

This has of course gotten spun wildly out of control, with a common interpretation of this situation being that Obama must provide his birth certificate by December 1st. This conveniently ignores that Obama *has* provided it, and the state of his birth *has* confirmed that it’s the real thing. (They’ve also confirmed that the idea that their governor — who by the way is a Republican who spoke at the RNC — did anything to “seal” his birth records is a crock). See:

http://www.starbulletin.com/news/breaking/33670554.html

Still with me? It’s time for the question….

Given that the most likely response to this request will be for the non-Berg parties to say “here’s why we think the writ should not be issued” and the most likely response from SCOTUS will be “makes sense to us”, what will the next phase of the conspiracy story be?

OK, Greeneyed Gila has turned up another one – Andy Martin has filed suit against the head of the Hawaii Department of Health and Governor Lingle, with a due date of Monday November 18. Two minor problems with this: A) Martin is a yet another raving nutbar, and B) the state denied the petition a few weeks ago.

http://www.state.hi.us/jud/opinions/sct/2008/29414ord.pdf

Nightmare: Obama *has* “shown the darn thing”, and most people (including the state of Hawaii) concur that it’s the real thing. Berg lost his suit and is appealing it to the Supreme Court, so it’s “ongoing” in that sense, but should it be?

Have you actually read the suit? It’s kind of nutty, to say the least. Among other things, he’s suing the DNC for compensation for his time spent campaigning for Hillary Clinton, since Obama won and she didn’t.

As a Constitutional Attorney, do you think Obama will denounce the Patriot Act in lieu of Habeus Corpus?

Habeus Corpus = Lat. “you have the body” Prisoners often seek release by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A writ of habeas corpus is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that an inmate be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody. A habeas corpus petition is a petition filed with a court by a person who objects to his own or another’s detention or imprisonment. The petition must show that the court ordering the detention or imprisonment made a legal or factual error. Habeas corpus petitions are usually filed by persons serving prison sentences. In family law, a parent who has been denied custody of his child by a trial court may file a habeas corpus petition. Also, a party may file a habeas corpus petition if a judge declares her in contempt of court and jails or threatens to jail her.
———————————————————————
It is incredible that we did not picket the White House and get an impeachment hearing on this one. George Bush should have been put in prison without rights of Habeus Corpus.